If You Can't Do It, the Government Can
By
David L. Miner
In the last essay, we discussed the issue of rights and
where rights come from. We saw that the Founding Fathers believed
that all rights originate in the Creator and rested in the people. We
also saw that the people delegated certain responsibilities to the
State and federal governments, and only certain
responsibilities. Based on these statements of fact, we come face to
face with a very important question: If We the People cannot
require others to submit to a course of action, can our government
require us to submit to that same course of action?
This question is very important, even critical, in
virtually every discussion of individual sovereign rights versus
government authority. Can the government, any government,
require you and me to perform some action or submit to some
requirement that you and I cannot require our neighbor to perform or
submit to? The quick and simple answer to that question is a
resounding “NO!” Let’s see why this is true.
First, we have established the fact that our federal
Constitution is founded on the belief that all rights in America rest
with We The People. Second, we have established the
fact that our Constitution is founded on the belief that the federal
government has no right or authority that was not delegated to it by
the Constitution. Third, We The People cannot delegate
any authority to anyone which We The People do not
first possess. This bodes ill for our federal government.
You see, the federal government almost daily involves
itself in restrictions and requirements on American Citizens that We
The People do not have and never have had the authority to
do. Let us explain.
Do I have the right to save for my future retirement?
The answer is a simple, “Yes.” Do you have the right to save for
your future retirement? Again, the answer is, “Yes.” But do I
have the authority to require you to save for your future retirement?
The obvious answer is, “No.” Do you have the authority to require
me to save for my future retirement? Again, the answer is, “No.”
Even if someone's failure to save for their future retirement affects
someone else negatively, neither you not I have the authority to
require that person to save for their retirement. So, since that is
true, can you and I delegate to the government the authority to
require you and me to save for our respective or collective futures?
The answer is again a resounding, “No!”
Do I have the right to contribute to disaster victims
here and around the world? The answer is a simple, “Yes.” Do you
have the right to contribute to disaster victims here and around the
world? Again, the answer is, “Yes.” But do I have the authority
to require you to contribute to disaster victims? The obvious answer
is, ‘No.” Do you have the authority to require me to contribute
to disaster victims? Again, the answer is, “No.” Then can you and
I delegate to the government the authority to require you and me to
contribute to disaster victims here and around the world? The answer
is again a resounding, “No!”
Do I have a right to
remove guns from my house as an effort to reduce the risk of
accidental injury in my house? The answer is a simple, “Yes.” Do
you have the right to remove guns from your house as an effort at
reducing the risk of accidental injury in your house? Again, the
answer is, “Yes.” But do I have the right to force you to remove
guns from your house? The obvious answer is, “No.” Do you have
the right to force me to remove guns from my house? Again, the answer
is, “No.” Then can you and I delegate to the government the
authority to force you and me to remove guns from our houses? The
answer is again a resounding, “No!”
Do you begin to see the obvious reasoning here? Can
We The People delegate to our government any authority that we do not
first have? Absolutely not! Can our
government then exercise authority it has not been delegated? Again,
absolutely not! Not, that is, and still call itself a Constitutional
government.
Has the federal government exercised authority that We
The People have not delegated to it? The obvious answer is,
“Yes.” Can the government expect We The People to
consider it Constitutional while it is usurping authority we never
granted it? Again, the answer is a resounding, “No!”
Now comes the really hard questions. Can We The
People require our federal government to live within its
limits of authority? Before you answer that question, you should know
it was a trick question. We The People have
already required the federal government to live
within its limitations. We did so in the document we wrote and called
the Constitution for the United States of America. Has this document
made very much difference in the government’s grab for more power
and authority? No, it has not.
If the Constitution, the document that creates the
federal government and gives it all of its powers, cannot stop the
federal government from exceeding its lawful authority, what do
you really and truly believe will
bring our federal government back into lawful submission to We The
People and our Constitution?
"Those
who make peaceful change impossible," said John F. Kennedy,
"make violent change inevitable."
Comments
Post a Comment