Why I Won't Be Watching Football At Christmas
Glenn A. Griffis -- I
am thankful for that my parents put little value in their children's
athletic development. I, too, am glad that while my wife and I put a
greater emphasis on our children's athletic development than my
parents did, it was never a priority in our children's lives. Yet all
my life I have been told by educators and parenting experts that,
"Athletics build character." Does it? Does our cultural
experience with athletics support that premise? I submit that once
people start getting serious about athletics, usually in High School,
that there is no necessary connection between character development
and athletics. As a matter of fact, I believe most athletic
departments are motivated by popular social trends rather than by
virtue. What athletics supports is people who conform to the popular
social opinion. These thoughts in no way seek to disparage, athletes
or athletics. I enjoy watching a good game or playing a good game as
much as anybody, and I recognize that like anything else it takes
discipline, hard work skill to play a sport. Being a successful
athlete also requires the ability to work in a group and to
participate in a team. It is a legitimate field of work that I in no
way seek to harm, but what I disagree with is the concept that team
sports builds character and virtue any more than does finance or engineering. There
is no connection between hard work, discipline character development
and athletic success.
It
takes hard work and discipline to succeed at anything -- engineering,
accounting, ministry, marriage, parenting business, gaming, art,
music. Yet all of these vocations have there share of magnanimous
participants and nefarious ones. Character has nothing to do with
what you do, it has to do with who you are and the values upon which
your life is built. Yet the sports industry beginning from high
school has built an institution on a false premise-- that sports
build character, and that athletes because of their athletic prowess
are somehow role models.
So it is fair to ask whether those of us who support these institutions -- through school taxes, local sports and entertainment taxes, subsidies for stadiums-- are recouping our investment. Recent developments in the sports world have caused me to ask is it time to end tax supported organized sports?
Character has nothing to do with what you do, it has to do with who you are and the values upon which your life is built. Yet the sports industry beginning from High School has built an institution on a false premise-- that sports build character, and that athletes because of their athletic prowess are somehow role models.
So it is fair to ask whether those of us who support these institutions -- through school taxes, local sports and entertainment taxes, subsidies for stadiums-- are recouping our investment. Recent developments in the sports world have caused me to ask is it time to end tax supported organized sports?
President
Trump's recent negotiation for the release of three UCLA basketball
players show that many athletes in tax supported athletics are
hedonistic with little sense of virtue. The sports environment
creates a sense of hubris. I argue that what happened with these
three athletes is unexceptional in American sports. During a recent
trip to the Philippines President Trump learned
that three UCLA athletes were in custody in China for shop lifting,
and negotiated their release from China. Upon their release the
athletes offered no statement of thanks to Trump or the State
Department for intervening, and in fact, complained that Trump did
not pick them up in Air Force one and return them to the U.S. In
other words, they thought they were deserving of Trump's attention
and efforts. After the students returned to the United States they read public statements of thanks and appreciation to Trump. The
statements were remarkably similar in language and form, frankly,
they made me wonder if someone had written the statements for them
and had required them to read them. From my perspective they seemed
disingenuous. Unfortunately, my suspicion was confirmed when Liangelo
Ball admitted that he had been compelled to read the statement.
There meaculpa was nothing more than a PR stunt.
It
became clear that the athletic athletic culture in which these young
men lived created an entitlement mentality that was both narcissistic
and nihilistic. Lavar Ball, a sports commentator and Liangelo Ball's
father, summed up the attitude that we so often see in sports. He said
he owed no thanks to Trump and that his son's “bad decision,” to
shoplift was not “a big deal.” Ball stated that ghetto kids had
done much worse. Of course, Liangelo was no ghetto kid. He had grown
up in the home of a well paid respected sports commentator so the
comparison was specious. The father clearly excused his son's
behavior because he was a black athlete. Far from building his
character the athletic environment at UCLA was rewarding his moral
bankruptcy. His father blatantly stated that there were many worse
things his son could have done. This example of
narcissistic dis-ingenuity is incipient to the modern sports
environment, and that one of the things that enables this culture to
thrive is the huge amount of taxes spent on sports.
My own experience in junior high and middle school was far from
unique. I am not alone in saying junior high and high school were the
most difficult years of my life. One of the contributing factors was
that in most public junior high and high school students who are
nonathletic are social pariah's. This in no way diminishes my own
role in my pariah status. Yes, I was awkward, physically and
socially. Yes, I not only did not fit in, I made no effort to fit in,
and in some ways was a spoiled brat. This post is in no may meant to
complain about my treatment. Yet I would argue that the culture of
secondary education is difficult for most people, because those who
cannot fit into the sports mold find very little support and help to
overcome their deficiencies.
The elevation of excellent athletes to hero status has caused a focus
on image rather than that substance leading to entitlement
mentalities more than it does virtuosity. To me the events
surrounding the three UCLA players return from a Chinese jail, are
representative of what we see in high school and college sports.
Instead of athletes being expected to apply their discipline and hard
work to their life off the field, their peccadilloes are excused and
even supported. Very few sports leagues are driven by a
responsibility to serve the country, the school, or the community.
Yet the community is repeatedly asked to to accommodate their every
whim and compensate for their failures even to excuse their excesses
for the sake of team. I would further submit that football in
particular is vacant of virtue.
Like so many other things football has been politicized by government
money. The Minnesota Vikings will be playing next year in a stadium
that will costs state and local taxpayers $678 million dollars. This
in a state that has a 1.1 billion dollar government deficit. The team
will pay $13 million dollars a year to use the stadium but will
recoup that plus profit from parking, food, luxury boxes, naming
rights and more. The team is worth $800 million and its owner has a
net worth of 374 million dollars. Why
should taxpayers pay for this? What do they get for it?
This scenario is repeated in city after city, and professional
football is only part of the story. Last year Rutgers's University,
hardly a major football school, received a $29 million grant from the
from the state. Multiply that by all of the university football
programs and a lot of heath care could be funded with the money. The
defense budget could be funded. It doesn't stop there. Excessive
government spending on sports goes as far down as High School. Last
year the state of Texas spent $60
million dollars to build a high school football stadium in Allen.
The United States government spends several dollars more per high
school football player than it does to support any student in a math
program. When you compare the US educational out comes with
countries where athletics are funded equally to classroom costs, or less than classroom costs, or lack public funding all together, they are far superior in the educational
quality of the students.
What do we get for tax dollars spent on sports?. We get sports officials who advocate and promote an entitlement mentality. Star players are elevated as heroes or role model regardless of their lives.
When you compare the US educational out comes with countries where athletics are funded equally to classroom costs, or less than classroom skills, or lack public funding all together, they are far superior in the educational quality of the students.
What do we get for tax dollars spent on sports?. We get sports officials who advocate and promote an entitlement mentality. Star players are elevated as heroes or role model regardless of their lives.
Nearly
two years ago while a football star at FSU now Tampa Bay Buccaneer
quarterback Jameis Winston was accused
of rape.
The University circled the wagons around Winston to protect their
star's reputation. The Tallahassee media and FSU alumni association
paid for his defense and continually maligned and insulted his
accuser until she settled out of court. Now that Winston is an NFL
quarterback he has sued his accuser. She agreed to an out of court
settlement, but is participating in a documentary about how college
football contributes to the rape culture on campus. (Good for her.)
Of course only the two people involved know the truth and either Mr.
Winston or the woman is lying, but Winston and FSU have a lot more to
lose from the rape accusation than does the woman, and there is no
doubt that team protected their star player.
So
football players whether they be high school, college or pro come on
the field to among other things protect the institutions that
supports it. For many in the NFL and the sports networks that cover
it, football players are rewarded for advocating a statist,
progressive, hedonistic or nihilistic lifestyle. Is this not what
Colin Kapernik's protest is about? It is about the supposed white
supremacy and privilege and injustice in our society, especially seen
in recent shootings of African American men by police officers. The
institution of football has become a vehicle for a liberal social
agenda. Players who kneel before the flag and the anthem to make a
statement, based an entirely false premise, supposedly point are
bringing attention to injustice in the United States. They have
turned the games into venues for political discussion. It is for this
reason that I won't be watching football this Christmas, and for which
Samson's Jawbone is calling for the defunding of extra-curricular, intramural school
and professional sports. (Can you name any other
extra-curricular or intramural activity that receives so much tax
support? How much money does the drama club get?)
For
high schools, other than basic wooden or concrete bleachers, not one
penny of tax payer money should go into extra-curricular sports
programs. While some would argue that this would disadvantage
minority students. I believe tax dollars spent on sports in minority
areas is a red herring. While many minority students dream of a
sports career to get them out of poverty, an infinitesimally
small percentage will ever realize that dream. It is a false hope.
If tax payer dollars were spent on Science, Chemistry, Math, or vocational training that were spent on Football a much higher number of poor students would find the American dream. Let the extra-curricular and intramural sports be supported by fees for players and by local boosters. Colleges and Universities football should be supported by students, family and alumni and booster contributions. Professional football should get their revenue from tickets, sales, television advertising and contracts. Their teams should compete for talent in the free market like every other business.
While many minority students dream of a sports career to get them out of poverty, an infinitesimally small percentage will ever realize that dream. It is a false hope.
If tax payer dollars were spent on Science, Chemistry, Math, or vocational training that were spent on Football a much higher number of poor students would find the American dream. Let the extra-curricular and intramural sports be supported by fees for players and by local boosters. Colleges and Universities football should be supported by students, family and alumni and booster contributions. Professional football should get their revenue from tickets, sales, television advertising and contracts. Their teams should compete for talent in the free market like every other business.
When
football players are allowed to demean and disrespect the American
flag, and anthem, and insult their audience to the extent that the
game suffers enormous losses, it's time to do something. When
football players representing the United States of America commit
crimes in other countries with no remorse and only disingenuous
apologies the mendacity of the sports culture becomes evident. And
like so many other areas of life, government funding exempts the
individual from responsibility for their actions and corrupts the
environment. Far from building character organized sport has become
perfidious. It's time to take politics out of the sport, and the
only way that will happen is if we cut off the tax dollars from the
sports. The only way to put character and virtue back into sports is
to get politics out of it. The best way to get politics out is to cut
the flow of government money. It is time to defund tax supported
football and other sports programs immediately.
Comments
Post a Comment